Advanced Citizenship Is A Two-Way Street

Another instance of a "public figure" being a racist - wait! She is a liberal - so what she said does not matter. In case you do not know what I am talking about, Sarah Jeong has become a member of The New York Times editorial board.

OK. You are asking why is this important. Well, let me show you.

Offended? If so, then you must be conservative... or a decent human being. Let the show continue. Liberals are clearly intolerant and hypocritical - at the same time. (Note: This is just a few tweets. There are many more and now videos of her sharing her "views" on race as well.)

As for clear hypocrisy - Joe Scarborough ("Morning Joe") tweeted this in response to a question that was posed about Ms. Jeong's racist tweets.

So, Joe (@JoeNBC) is using a quote by Obama to defend her tweets as a "different point of view." Let the lunacy continue. Racism is racism - unless it is a different point of view. Huh?!

Let me see - could it be Joe was claiming it as "freedom of speech?" She is stating her opinion. But you would be wrong - (Link to the original tweet)

Are the people who are stating their opinion of Jim Acosta not entitled to do so? How can a liberal claim free speech in one instance while also immediately labeling it as the end of democracy as we know it?

---

As for "mob rule" - Let's go to Portland, Oregon. Antifa v/s Patriot Prayer - Round 3

• Fox News (This is from June 3.)

• Washington Post (June 30)

On the #MediaBias front, if you read the Washington Post article, you will see that they label just the Patriot Prayer group as the violent group. Again, are they delusional? If Antifa shows up, violence is there. Just do a Google search. This is their intent.

"Guns are a tool," he says between bursts of crackling gunfire. "You'd rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it."

So, liberal anti-fascists with guns hell bent on violence are OK while law-abiding citizens are evil and should be disarmed. Who knew? (Sarcasm intended.)

---

This is the problem that you have when you do not realize that racism is not a one-way street. You do not address the problem - you exacerbate it. You are the problem - not the solution. You will never see the unequivocal denunciation of racism in the media. It does not generate ratings. It does not generate sales. (But that is a different discussion altogether - "Media: Enemy of the American People".)

The problem is that if you see free speech as a one way street. Then you have done more to stifle free speech than a dictator. (See safe spaces and microagressions.) As a RGIII put it in a tweet, you will suffer under tyranny.

America is advanced citizenship. Time for people to graduate.