Hypocrisy and "Assassination"
- Chris McAllister

- Sep 23, 2018
- 2 min read
There is a lot of "conversation" going on currently about the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
You have Senate Democrats going into apoplectic shock as they strive to do whatever it takes to delay and/or derail a Senate Judiciary Committee vote or as Dan Bongino put it -

You have to wonder just how bad is it. Well, as I mentioned here, Dr. Ford is accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault that occurred 35 years ago.
Now, let the hypocrisy begin.
The Assassination of Judge Kavanaugh
Dr. Ford identifies four people by name as being in the room when the assault happened. Not one person corroborated her story. (One of the four was Kavanaugh himself.)
Not one. Let that sink in! The lack of corroboration does not stop Senate Democrats from frothing at the mouth that the vote must be delayed.
Dianne Feinstein sat on a letter she received in July and has only released a redacted copy to the Senate Republicans. She is pushing for a delay even though even though she says - " “I can’t say that everything is truthful."
Mazie Hirono says that Kavanaugh should be denied due process (which is guaranteed by the Constitution) because his career undercuts his credibility without the benefit of actual testimony by Dr. Ford or an investigation by the FBI.
It does not stop leftist activists from doing the same.
Demand Justice, a Soros funded group, has launched an ad campaign attacking Kavanaugh's character. They have done everything they can including - without corroborating evidence - smearing Kavanaugh as a sexual predator and comparing him to "child predator" Judge Roy Moore.
The website - https://ibelievechristineblaseyford.org/ - was launched after Dr. Ford came forward. They have publicly declared that Kavanaugh is a verified liar who has done so under oath during his testimony.
Kavanaugh’s nomination is on the ropes; he has everything to gain by lying. He has already lied, multiple times, under oath before the Senate. There is no reason to trust his word now.
Yet, nowhere on their own site do they even try to make a case to back up this statement.
Should we discuss the "media's" part in this assassination?




Meanwhile - No one wants to talk about -