Liberalism Is Fundamentally Flawed #1 - Gun Control
- Chris McAllister
- Feb 23, 2018
- 2 min read
With the insanity we now have on the heels of the Parkland shooting, it has to be evidently clear that liberalism is fundamentally flawed. If you can approach it from a purely logical - almost scientific - perspective, it is the only conclusion you can come to.
I am going to work my way through a number of "issues" that liberals find near and dear to their collective "hearts" and show to you how flawed the philosophy is.
Gun Control
A liberal will tell you that we need to stop the "slaughter of our children" (which no one would disagree with) by taking AR-15s away from everyone. A lot of people would agree to this almost willingly. But there is a problem, according to them, guns kill people. The AR-15 is only one type of gun. The Virginia Tech shooter did not use an AR-15 - he used handguns.
So, the flaw - actually in this case, the outright lie - is that they will stop with an assault weapons ban. The reality is if they want to really stop the "slaughter of our children", then they will come for every gun. They have no choice.
But let's continue with their argument. The only 'people' who need guns are the police according to the liberal. (If you are seeing where I am going with this, then you are already laughing.) However, let's see if you remember these police descriptions -
"Acted stupidly" (Barack Obama)
"Racist" - historically and systemically (Vox.com)
"Homicidal" and "Abusive" - (The Atlantic)
"Corrupt" - (ABC, The New York Times)
"Militarized" - (Politico, The Economist)
"Violent" - (Maxine Waters)
I just want to make this perfectly clear. This list could go on and on forever - especially with the current liberal attitude towards the police. I also want to make sure you see that this has been the attitude of liberals towards the police from a longitudinal perspective. It is not a new phenomenon. It is a historical certainty.
Yet, the police are the people they want to have the guns when they discuss gun control. I would like a liberal to step up and reconcile the differences between these two fundamental contradictions.
Is there a liberal out there who can do that for us?
Liberals remind me of actors the way they turn the tears on and off in an instant. They went into damn near hysterics over the Florida school shooting, however they have no issues at all with children killed every day by gun violence in "gun free" Chicago. Oddest thing....one a terrible shocking tragedy - the other a big yawn.
The liberal rule book on violence is impossible to understand. They are offended over every little spoken word that they disagree with - but have no problem at all with antifa thugs beating the crap out of their fellow citizens and utterly destroying property on campus free speech events. Clearly there is "good violence" and "bad violence" in liberal-land.
Liberals flew…